Good morning. Welcome to the Executive Brief: 10+ hours of AI breakthroughs, distilled into a crisp 5-minute read. We deliver intelligence for executives who want to stay ahead. First-mover insights only.

In this week's edition, we dive into the AI perception chasm dividing C-suites and cubicles, shadow AI running rampant across enterprises, and McKinsey's roadmap for AI transformation that's separating winners from the rest.

Let's get right to it.

Today’s Brief

• AI Amnesty Programs emerge as companies face 485% surge in shadow AI usage

• McKinsey's State of AI 2025 shows CEO oversight drives higher AI ROI

• AI Perception Gap reveals stark divide between executives and employees

^{Read time: 7 minutes}

AI News

Why Companies Are Embracing AI Amnesty Instead Of Fighting Shadow AI

The Brief: Organizations are discovering that employees are using unauthorized AI tools at unprecedented rates, with a recent study finding half of all employees utilizing unsanctioned AI applications despite company policies, prompting forward-thinking businesses to implement AI amnesty programs rather than cracking down on this behavior.

The details:

• Corporate data flowing into AI platforms has surged by 485 percent in the past year according to a Cyberhaven AI Adoption and Risk report, highlighting the explosive growth of AI tool usage in workplaces.

• A Software AG study of 6,000 knowledge workers found that 46 percent would continue using unauthorized AI tools even if explicitly banned by management.

• Shadow AI usage varies by industry, with financial services seeing a 250 percent increase, while healthcare and manufacturing follow closely at 230 percent and 233 percent respectively, according to Zendesk's CX Trends 2025 report.

• The risks of unmanaged AI usage include exposure of sensitive company data, compliance violations, inconsistent business insights from different AI platforms, potential algorithmic bias, and operational fragmentation.

• Progressive companies are viewing shadow AI not as a threat but as valuable market research, recognizing that when employees risk their jobs to use certain tools, those tools likely offer significant productivity benefits.

• The six-step framework for implementing an AI amnesty program includes building governance foundations, transforming IT from gatekeepers to enablers, making AI education accessible, deploying technical safeguards, fostering an AI-positive culture, and continuously monitoring and adapting.

• Creating "AI sandboxes" where teams can safely experiment with new tools under IT supervision represents one practical approach to balancing innovation with security concerns.

Why it matters: The explosive growth of shadow AI presents both significant risks and opportunities for businesses. Rather than futilely attempting to prevent AI adoption, companies should implement amnesty programs that acknowledge the reality of widespread AI usage while providing governance frameworks that protect organizational interests. This approach transforms a potential security crisis into a competitive advantage by harnessing employee-driven innovation while maintaining appropriate guardrails for responsible AI deployment. Organizations that adapt quickly will leverage AI as a strategic asset rather than treating it as a compliance nightmare.

The State of AI in 2025: How Organizations Are Rewiring to Capture Value

The Brief: A recent McKinsey report titled "The State of AI" reveals organizations are beginning to establish the structures and processes needed to generate meaningful value from generative AI, with larger companies leading in adoption, workflow redesign, and risk management strategies.

The details:

• More than three-quarters of respondents report their organizations use AI in at least one business function, with generative AI use rapidly increasing to 71% of respondents (up from 65% in early 2024).

• CEO oversight of AI governance strongly correlates with higher bottom-line impact, particularly in larger companies where redesigning workflows has the biggest effect on realizing EBIT improvements from generative AI.

• Only 28% of organizations have their CEO overseeing AI governance, and just 21% have fundamentally redesigned workflows to optimize for AI implementation.

• Organizations are selectively centralizing certain elements of AI deployment, with risk and compliance often fully centralized while tech talent and AI solution adoption typically follow hybrid models.

• Companies vary widely in their monitoring approaches, with 27% reviewing all AI-generated content before use and an equal proportion checking 20% or less of outputs.

• Less than one-third of respondents report their organizations are following most of McKinsey's 12 best practices for AI adoption, with larger companies (>$500M revenue) significantly outpacing smaller firms in areas like establishing dedicated AI teams and implementation roadmaps.

• While AI use is increasing across business functions, relatively few organizations are seeing material enterprise-wide EBIT impacts, though function-specific revenue and cost benefits are growing.

Why it matters: Organizations are at a critical inflection point where those taking a comprehensive, CEO-led approach to AI transformation are beginning to see significant value, while those pursuing piecemeal implementations risk falling behind. Rather than focusing on individual use cases, companies should adopt enterprise-wide transformative visions with clear road maps, dedicated teams, and effective KPI tracking. As Michael Chui notes, "AI only makes an impact in the real world when enterprises adapt to the new capabilities these technologies enable," making organizational readiness and strategic implementation as crucial as the technology itself.

The AI Perception Gap: Leaders and Employees See Different AI Realities

The Brief: A December 2024 survey of 800 employees and 800 C-suite executives by enterprise AI company Writer reveals significant disconnects in how leadership and workers perceive AI implementation in their organizations, with executives consistently more positive about AI adoption than frontline employees.

The details:

• A substantial perception gap exists between leadership and employees, with 73% of C-suite executives believing their company's AI approach is well-controlled and strategic, compared to just 47% of employees sharing this view.

• Three-quarters (75%) of executives think their company has successfully adopted AI over the past year, while fewer than half (45%) of employees agree with this assessment.

• There's a dramatic difference in awareness of AI strategy, with 89% of C-suite leaders saying their company has an AI strategy versus only 57% of employees recognizing such a strategy exists.

• The AI literacy divide is stark, with 64% of executives believing their organization has high AI literacy, compared to just 33% of employees.

• Half of executives surveyed admit that AI is "tearing their company apart," highlighting deep organizational tensions around implementation.

• Frustration runs high at all levels: 94% of C-suite executives report dissatisfaction with their current AI solutions, while approximately half of employees complain that AI-generated information is inaccurate, confusing, and biased.

• Employee resistance is significant, with 41% of Millennial and Gen Z employees confessing to actively sabotaging their company's AI strategy by refusing to use AI tools.

• Remarkably, 59% of executives say they're "actively looking for a new job with a company that's more innovative with generative AI," compared to 35% of employees.

Why it matters: The dramatic disconnect between how leaders and workers perceive AI implementations threatens to derail enterprise AI initiatives and exacerbate workplace tensions. To bridge this gap, executives must address both legitimate employee concerns about job security and implement genuinely useful AI tools that solve real problems rather than creating additional friction. Without alignment between leadership vision and employee experience, companies risk accelerating turnover, reducing productivity, and wasting significant investment on AI solutions that face internal resistance. For AI to deliver on its promise, organizations need to develop transparent strategies that clearly communicate how AI will enhance rather than replace human work.