AI’s Reality Check: Gaps, Battles, and Breakthroughs in Business

From perception divides to fraud defenses and coaching innovations—critical updates for leaders navigating the AI landscape

Good morning. Welcome to the Executive Brief: 10+ hours of AI breakthroughs, distilled into a crisp 5-minute read. We deliver intelligence for executives who want to stay ahead. First-mover insights only.

Today’s Brief

  • AI Transforms Financial Risk in a high-stakes defender vs attacker race

  • AI Coaching Tools democratize management training beyond executives

  • Corporate AI Implementation reveals productivity wins amid reality checks

Read time: 7 minutes

AI News

The Brief: Financial institutions like Capital One, Visa, and Alloy are leveraging AI to combat increasingly sophisticated fraud threats, while simultaneously facing new challenges as cybercriminals adopt AI tools such as "FraudGPT" to enhance their attack capabilities.

The details:

  • Visa has been using AI for fraud detection since 1992 and now processes over $16 trillion annually, with President of Technology Rajat Taneja emphasizing that "trust is the very foundation of commerce."

  • Cybercriminals are utilizing AI tools specifically designed for fraudulent activities, with "FraudGPT" subscriptions ranging from $200 monthly to $1,700 yearly for creating phishing emails and undetectable malware.

  • Capital One's Chief Scientist Prem Natarajan describes modern AI-driven fraud as a "shape-shifter" that can adapt in real-time during interactions, making these threats uniquely challenging.

  • Alloy co-founder Laura Spiekerman noted that while deepfakes grab headlines, the more concerning trend is how AI dramatically accelerates synthetic fraud operations that combine real and fake credentials.

  • Financial institutions often respond to fraud by completely shutting down operations rather than using AI to selectively adjust their systems for legitimate customers.

  • Capital One has implemented AI in its Chat Concierge system and call centers to improve customer experience while maintaining human oversight as a guardrail.

  • Looking ahead, AI in finance is expected to evolve from enabling interactions to automating actions, with Visa exploring "agentic commerce" where AI agents handle research, price matching, and product recommendations.

Why it matters: The AI arms race in financial services is intensifying as both defensive and offensive capabilities advance rapidly. Financial institutions must invest in sophisticated AI detection systems while maintaining appropriate human oversight to avoid overreaction to threats. Companies should focus on developing flexible AI models that can adapt to fraud patterns in real-time rather than implementing binary "shut down" responses, while simultaneously preparing for the next evolution where AI moves from advisory to action-taking roles in financial transactions.

The Brief: Companies are increasingly turning to AI-powered coaching tools to help managers improve their leadership skills, particularly for handling difficult workplace conversations, as these tools offer scalable training that was previously only available to executives through expensive coaching programs.

The details:

  • Businesses are recognizing the critical importance of effective management, with studies showing managers directly influence about 70% of worker engagement differences between teams according to Gallup.

  • Poor management comes with steep financial consequences—a 2019 study estimated toxic workplace culture cost companies $223 billion over five years, while another found businesses lose up to $1 trillion annually in voluntary turnover.

  • Several companies have launched AI management coaching products, including Praxis Labs' GenAI-enabled platform, CodeSignal's audio-based role-play scenarios, and Skillsoft's CAISY feedback model.

  • These tools allow managers to practice difficult conversations in a safe environment, with AI bots that can be programmed with different personality styles (accepting, dismissive, defensive) to simulate various employee reactions.

  • The technology is particularly targeting middle managers who typically don't receive the high-level coaching reserved for executives but are crucial for employee retention and productivity.

  • AI coaching solutions can incorporate company-specific culture documents and training materials to align with individual organizational values and expectations.

  • Experts emphasize these tools should supplement rather than replace traditional training, with Skillsoft's Apratim Purakayastha noting, "I would still not consider this as a replacement for more traditional management training."

Why it matters: AI coaching represents a potential breakthrough in democratizing leadership training across organizations, moving beyond the executive suite to improve management at all levels. Companies should view these tools as part of a comprehensive management development strategy rather than standalone solutions. The most effective approach will combine AI practice sessions with real-world feedback loops and human oversight to verify improved outcomes, particularly as Bryan Ackermann of Korn Ferry warns against any approach that starts with "I'm going to let the bot handle this and then walk away."

The Brief: Companies across corporate America are experimenting with generative AI to boost productivity, with some notable successes in automating time-consuming tasks, but many organizations are still grappling with implementation challenges including AI hallucinations and determining the technology's proper role in workflows.

The details:

  • About 1 in 6 U.S. workers report using AI to perform at least some of their job functions, while an additional 25% believe AI could handle portions of their work, according to recent Pew research.

  • Jason Rabinowitz of airline retailing firm ATPCO found that work that previously took days can now be completed in about two hours with AI assistance, particularly for complex workflows involving multiple spreadsheets.

  • ATPCO conducted blind trials comparing AI-translated content against human translations and discovered the AI versions were often "more readable and more accurate."

  • There's a significant divide in how AI is approached - Microsoft's Alexia Cambon distinguishes between the command-based approach (giving AI simple prompts) and the conversation-based approach (using AI as a thinking partner), with the latter requiring more critical thinking.

  • Public sentiment about AI remains mixed, with 52% of workers expressing concern about its impact while 36% remain optimistic about its potential.

  • Ed Zitron, CEO of EZPR and a prominent AI skeptic, criticizes corporate leaders who push AI implementation despite being disconnected from day-to-day operations and not understanding its practical applications.

  • AI hallucinations remain a persistent challenge, often requiring human oversight that can sometimes be more time-consuming than performing tasks without AI assistance.

Why it matters: AI adoption is at a critical inflection point where companies must move beyond the hype to develop thoughtful implementation strategies. Organizations should focus on identifying specific workflows where AI can add genuine value rather than applying it broadly without clear purpose. The most successful applications will likely combine AI's efficiency with human judgment, particularly in areas requiring creativity or context sensitivity, while ensuring sufficient guardrails are in place to address hallucination issues and maintain quality control.

Your Next Move

Accelerate your AI strategy by embracing the balance between innovation and protection:

Challenge your leadership team:

  • "Are we proactively redesigning workflows for AI, or merely layering tech onto existing processes?"

  • "How might we close the perception gap between executives and employees to prevent AI initiatives from being sabotaged?"

  • "Where in our organization should we centralize AI governance versus distribute implementation?"

Ready for an implementation blueprint customized to your organization's AI maturity? Reply, and I'll share targeted strategies to bridge your specific technology-people-process gaps.

That’s it for today!

See you next time,

Executive Brief Editorial Team